Yoon,
H., & Jo, J. W. (2014). Direct and indirect access to corpora: An
exploratory case study comparing students’ error correction and learning
strategy use in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18,
96-117.
Introduction
- Data-driven learning (DDL) has shown positive effects to L2 learning.
- There are advantages and disadvantages in in-/direct use of the corpora.
- Research gap #1: comparative examination of both; hopes to address course and material design in how “L2 is taught and learned” (p. 98). Specifically, the “possible differences in student’s correction behavior” (p. 99) in both settings.
- Research gap #2: studies investigating learner strategies in corpus use and concordance analysis. “This is a critical missing link that should be established for corpus-based learning in the whole framework of L2 pedagogy” (p. 99).
Research Questions:
- Can corpus-based writing revision improve the students’ grammatical and lexical accuracy?
- What are students’ error correction patterns relative to direct and indirect corpus use, and is there any difference in the effectiveness of such patterns?
- What learning strategies do the learners employ in direct and indirect corpus use?
Methodology
- Subjects: Four freshmen EFL students with varying level of English and interest in English writing.
- Data Collection: Quantitative and qualitative. Collection of students’ writing, introspective and retrospective reports.
- Duration: 10 weeks, from March 28 to May 30, 2011.
- Online corpus: Lextutor